Comments on: Notre Dame is not Bowl Eligible http://loserswithsocks.com/2007/10/25/notre-dame-is-not-bowl-eligible/ Losers With Socks: SEC Speed Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:12:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Bob http://loserswithsocks.com/2007/10/25/notre-dame-is-not-bowl-eligible/#comment-44289 Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:49:27 +0000 http://loserswithsocks.com/2007/10/25/notre-dame-is-not-bowl-eligible/#comment-44289 Last time I checked, Boston College was Jesuit, and therefore “has Jesus” they also have bowl eligibility and high academic standards, and oddly, it isn’t a problem in Chestnut Hill.

]]> By: eery1 http://loserswithsocks.com/2007/10/25/notre-dame-is-not-bowl-eligible/#comment-44171 Fri, 26 Oct 2007 03:48:51 +0000 http://loserswithsocks.com/2007/10/25/notre-dame-is-not-bowl-eligible/#comment-44171 Q : What do Mary Jane and Notre Dame have in common?

A: They both get smoked in Bowls.

]]> By: Brock Landers http://loserswithsocks.com/2007/10/25/notre-dame-is-not-bowl-eligible/#comment-44110 Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:48:35 +0000 http://loserswithsocks.com/2007/10/25/notre-dame-is-not-bowl-eligible/#comment-44110 If I have to see one more picture of Charlie Weis I’m going to puke all over this keyboard.

]]> By: gatorhippy http://loserswithsocks.com/2007/10/25/notre-dame-is-not-bowl-eligible/#comment-44109 Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:29:00 +0000 http://loserswithsocks.com/2007/10/25/notre-dame-is-not-bowl-eligible/#comment-44109 Maybe not BOWL eligible…

But certainly BOWEL eligible…

]]>