<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Needed NCAA 09 Features</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/07/14/needed-ncaa-09-features/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/07/14/needed-ncaa-09-features/</link>
	<description>Losers With Socks:  SEC Speed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:12:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: uafan</title>
		<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/07/14/needed-ncaa-09-features/#comment-61711</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[uafan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=3186#comment-61711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[alabama&#039;s 4-0, georgia here we come =)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alabama&#8217;s 4-0, georgia here we come =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pac10Rules</title>
		<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/07/14/needed-ncaa-09-features/#comment-59609</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pac10Rules]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=3186#comment-59609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like you&#039;re thoughts.  Interesting ideas.  I tend to see an overpowered computer rush defense destroy my RBs.  But, if WRs get in the open field with DBs in man coverage, they can easily beat their man.  Makes defense a little less...fun? But, at the same time, I feel that DBs can get away with destroying WRs before the pass gets there without fear of pass interference.

And...you&#039;re a fucker for calling Desean Jackson a fucker.

GO BEARS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like you&#8217;re thoughts.  Interesting ideas.  I tend to see an overpowered computer rush defense destroy my RBs.  But, if WRs get in the open field with DBs in man coverage, they can easily beat their man.  Makes defense a little less&#8230;fun? But, at the same time, I feel that DBs can get away with destroying WRs before the pass gets there without fear of pass interference.</p>
<p>And&#8230;you&#8217;re a fucker for calling Desean Jackson a fucker.</p>
<p>GO BEARS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3rd Down H-Back</title>
		<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/07/14/needed-ncaa-09-features/#comment-59066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[3rd Down H-Back]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 20:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=3186#comment-59066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Got my copy at Gamestop on hold waiting for my ass.  You bitches better be ready for screenshots tomorrow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got my copy at Gamestop on hold waiting for my ass.  You bitches better be ready for screenshots tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

