<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should the NCAA be in charge of non-conference schedules?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/07/15/should-the-ncaa-be-in-charge-of-non-conference-schedules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/07/15/should-the-ncaa-be-in-charge-of-non-conference-schedules/</link>
	<description>Losers With Socks:  SEC Speed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 18:56:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrickdonohue</title>
		<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/07/15/should-the-ncaa-be-in-charge-of-non-conference-schedules/#comment-59058</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patrickdonohue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=3204#comment-59058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I think that why teams continue to schedule the way they have been is pretty obvious. The BCS (with last year serving as the exception) doesn&#039;t allow for a team to lose more than once, if at all, in order to be considered for the national championship game. With conference play in conferences like the Big 12, SEC and Pac-10 getting stiffer every year, fewer and fewer teams are willing to risk a chance at a national championship by scheduling a tough out-of-conference game and risk an early-season loss before conference play begins.

Do I think there&#039;s anyway college football would adopt a system like the one I proposed? No way but it&#039;s a fun exercise to think about ways to tweak the system and make it better especially when the people who could affect change to the system simply will not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think that why teams continue to schedule the way they have been is pretty obvious. The BCS (with last year serving as the exception) doesn&#8217;t allow for a team to lose more than once, if at all, in order to be considered for the national championship game. With conference play in conferences like the Big 12, SEC and Pac-10 getting stiffer every year, fewer and fewer teams are willing to risk a chance at a national championship by scheduling a tough out-of-conference game and risk an early-season loss before conference play begins.</p>
<p>Do I think there&#8217;s anyway college football would adopt a system like the one I proposed? No way but it&#8217;s a fun exercise to think about ways to tweak the system and make it better especially when the people who could affect change to the system simply will not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bwfull</title>
		<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/07/15/should-the-ncaa-be-in-charge-of-non-conference-schedules/#comment-59057</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bwfull]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=3204#comment-59057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moondogleft</title>
		<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/07/15/should-the-ncaa-be-in-charge-of-non-conference-schedules/#comment-59055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moondogleft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=3204#comment-59055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote an article several months ago along these lines, with regard to scheduling. The BCS has changed everything. I outlined why the BCS schools are scheduling the way they are and why they&#039;re going to continue to do so.

I don&#039;t post links to my stuff on other blogs but you can drop me a line at fjv4usn@gmail.com and I&#039;ll send you the link.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote an article several months ago along these lines, with regard to scheduling. The BCS has changed everything. I outlined why the BCS schools are scheduling the way they are and why they&#8217;re going to continue to do so.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t post links to my stuff on other blogs but you can drop me a line at <a href="mailto:fjv4usn@gmail.com">fjv4usn@gmail.com</a> and I&#8217;ll send you the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bwfull</title>
		<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/07/15/should-the-ncaa-be-in-charge-of-non-conference-schedules/#comment-59053</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bwfull]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=3204#comment-59053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@2
Good point.  Would an alternate solution therefore be to have the schools schedule their own o-o-c based on the formula?  Just eliminate &quot;big govt&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@2<br />
Good point.  Would an alternate solution therefore be to have the schools schedule their own o-o-c based on the formula?  Just eliminate &#8220;big govt&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moondogleft</title>
		<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/07/15/should-the-ncaa-be-in-charge-of-non-conference-schedules/#comment-59052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moondogleft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=3204#comment-59052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While an interesting proposition, it will never fly. Each school is going to operate as a separate entity because of one very simple reason - money. 

If a school doesn&#039;t have control over their scheduling, you may just as well let the NCAA control every aspect of each member&#039;s athletic departments.

I&#039;m opposed to big government and therefore, I view the NCAA just as I would any type of government oversight.

Ask yourself this question. How well does the government manage all of its programs? 

Thanks but no thanks to your suggestion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While an interesting proposition, it will never fly. Each school is going to operate as a separate entity because of one very simple reason &#8211; money. </p>
<p>If a school doesn&#8217;t have control over their scheduling, you may just as well let the NCAA control every aspect of each member&#8217;s athletic departments.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m opposed to big government and therefore, I view the NCAA just as I would any type of government oversight.</p>
<p>Ask yourself this question. How well does the government manage all of its programs? </p>
<p>Thanks but no thanks to your suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

