<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big 10 vs SEC Tournament</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/08/13/big-10-vs-sec-tournament/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/08/13/big-10-vs-sec-tournament/</link>
	<description>Losers With Socks:  SEC Speed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:50:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: neutralparty</title>
		<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/08/13/big-10-vs-sec-tournament/#comment-63333</link>
		<dc:creator>neutralparty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=3494#comment-63333</guid>
		<description>Oh I just checked...INELIGILE FOR A BOWL GAME!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I just checked&#8230;INELIGILE FOR A BOWL GAME!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: neutralparty</title>
		<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/08/13/big-10-vs-sec-tournament/#comment-63332</link>
		<dc:creator>neutralparty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=3494#comment-63332</guid>
		<description>so how did the Vols end up this year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so how did the Vols end up this year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scorched colon</title>
		<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/08/13/big-10-vs-sec-tournament/#comment-60016</link>
		<dc:creator>scorched colon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 13:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=3494#comment-60016</guid>
		<description>Speaking of turds.  That MIchigan blogger is part of the whole EDSBS/SMQ/RTT/ Westerbrook/Burnt Orange;  Cool Kid douchebaggerry Nation.  Swindle is virtually unreadable nowadays and Cook is bitter that Michigan sucks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of turds.  That MIchigan blogger is part of the whole EDSBS/SMQ/RTT/ Westerbrook/Burnt Orange;  Cool Kid douchebaggerry Nation.  Swindle is virtually unreadable nowadays and Cook is bitter that Michigan sucks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scorched colon</title>
		<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/08/13/big-10-vs-sec-tournament/#comment-60014</link>
		<dc:creator>scorched colon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 10:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=3494#comment-60014</guid>
		<description>Mat, your &quot;best&quot; would be lucky to become bowl eligible in the SEC.  Face the uncomfortable truth that watching Big 10 Football is:  Strained, forced, and painful like a turd made of anti-laxative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mat, your &#8220;best&#8221; would be lucky to become bowl eligible in the SEC.  Face the uncomfortable truth that watching Big 10 Football is:  Strained, forced, and painful like a turd made of anti-laxative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mat</title>
		<link>http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/08/13/big-10-vs-sec-tournament/#comment-60011</link>
		<dc:creator>mat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 03:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=3494#comment-60011</guid>
		<description>Not only are your match-ups chosen poorly, your assumptions about said match-ups are ludicrous.  A minimum of 4 of your called SEC wins would actually be wins for the Big10, putting it at 6-5, which is hardly a beatdown.  There are several others that would be a toss-up, making it more likely to be 6-5 or even 7-4 Big10.  And the stats aren&#039;t on your side.  In the BCS era, the two conferences have met 27 times in bowls.  The results:

Big10 14 - SEC 13

2007: SEC 2-1
UT by 4 over Wisconsin
UM by 6 over UF
LSU by 14 over OSU

2006: Big10 2-1
PSU by 10 over UT
Wiconsin by 3 over Arkansas
UF by 27 over OSU

2005: Tie 1-1
UF by 7 over Iowa
Wiconsin by 14 over Auburn

2004: Big10 2-1
Minnesota by 4 over Alabama
Georgia by 3 over Wisconsin
Iowa by 5 over LSU

2003: SEC 2-1
Auburn by 14 over Wisconsin
Iowa by 20 over UF
Georgia by 7 over Purdue

2002: Big10 2-1
Minnesota by 15 over Arkansas
UM by 8 over UF
Auburn by 4 over PSU

2001:SEC 3-0
S Carolina by 3 over OSU
UT by 28 over UM
LSU by 13 over Illinois

2000: Tie 1-1
S Carolina by 17 over OSU
UM by 3 over Auburn

1999: Big10 2-1
Georgia by 3 over Purdue
MSU by 3 over UF
UM by 1 over Alabama

1998: Big10 2-0
UM by 14 over Arkansas
PSU by 12 over Kentucky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only are your match-ups chosen poorly, your assumptions about said match-ups are ludicrous.  A minimum of 4 of your called SEC wins would actually be wins for the Big10, putting it at 6-5, which is hardly a beatdown.  There are several others that would be a toss-up, making it more likely to be 6-5 or even 7-4 Big10.  And the stats aren&#8217;t on your side.  In the BCS era, the two conferences have met 27 times in bowls.  The results:</p>
<p>Big10 14 &#8211; SEC 13</p>
<p>2007: SEC 2-1<br />
UT by 4 over Wisconsin<br />
UM by 6 over UF<br />
LSU by 14 over OSU</p>
<p>2006: Big10 2-1<br />
PSU by 10 over UT<br />
Wiconsin by 3 over Arkansas<br />
UF by 27 over OSU</p>
<p>2005: Tie 1-1<br />
UF by 7 over Iowa<br />
Wiconsin by 14 over Auburn</p>
<p>2004: Big10 2-1<br />
Minnesota by 4 over Alabama<br />
Georgia by 3 over Wisconsin<br />
Iowa by 5 over LSU</p>
<p>2003: SEC 2-1<br />
Auburn by 14 over Wisconsin<br />
Iowa by 20 over UF<br />
Georgia by 7 over Purdue</p>
<p>2002: Big10 2-1<br />
Minnesota by 15 over Arkansas<br />
UM by 8 over UF<br />
Auburn by 4 over PSU</p>
<p>2001:SEC 3-0<br />
S Carolina by 3 over OSU<br />
UT by 28 over UM<br />
LSU by 13 over Illinois</p>
<p>2000: Tie 1-1<br />
S Carolina by 17 over OSU<br />
UM by 3 over Auburn</p>
<p>1999: Big10 2-1<br />
Georgia by 3 over Purdue<br />
MSU by 3 over UF<br />
UM by 1 over Alabama</p>
<p>1998: Big10 2-0<br />
UM by 14 over Arkansas<br />
PSU by 12 over Kentucky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
