Comments on: Final SEC Power Poll http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/12/05/final-sec-power-poll/ Losers With Socks: SEC Speed Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:12:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: zigzag http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/12/05/final-sec-power-poll/#comment-63421 Mon, 08 Dec 2008 07:19:16 +0000 http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=5579#comment-63421 3-”Nutt won with the O’s players”? Stands to reason since they were the only players there. The question is, could BatShitCrazy have won with his players? Answer: BSC 0-8 in the SEC in 2007. HDN 5-3 in 2008.
Advantage? Nutt.

]]> By: FEAR THE HAT, BITCH http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/12/05/final-sec-power-poll/#comment-63395 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 06:49:21 +0000 http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=5579#comment-63395 you have us at 7?? come on, we’re better than the barners and scar….it was obvious the team packed it in after coulda shoulda woulda beating bama….the 4th qtr “Troy Miracle” was everything my tigers had left.

and no it won’t be Chavis. everyone knows it will be Robinson and coach O…and if it is Chavis, Berry will already transfer. so there.

imagine a press conference with Miles and Coach O:

Miles: “quality opponent, damn strong, working on the things we need to fix…”

O: yaw yaw yaw. yaw yaw yaw.

ps–Nutt won with the O’s players.

]]> By: Jai Eugene http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/12/05/final-sec-power-poll/#comment-63386 Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:46:27 +0000 http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=5579#comment-63386 Dirt

That is exactly what it means.

]]> By: Dirt Mcgirt http://loserswithsocks.com/2008/12/05/final-sec-power-poll/#comment-63384 Fri, 05 Dec 2008 23:06:45 +0000 http://loserwithsocks.wordpress.com/?p=5579#comment-63384 If you don’t not like Crompton then you don’t know shit about anything. The receivers did not help him out

Yeah, it sucks that the WRs couldn’t adjust to those laser rocket worm burners JC was throwing. Did one game just mean that there will be an entire off season of Cromptonite propaganda spewed?

]]>